extant literature in research

Absorptive capacity refers to the ability to recognize, assimilate and apply new external knowledge (Cohen and Levinthal 1990). Organizational cross-cultural differences in the context of innovation-oriented partnerships. The Journal of Technology Transfer, Methods for Literature Reviews - HKT Consultant 2011;18(4):6-10. doi: 10.7748/nr2011.07.18.4.6.c8636. 2015). sharing sensitive information, make sure youre on a federal After this, we turn to theoretical insights about how knowledge differences and characteristics influence the effectiveness of knowledge exchange and absorptive capacity. As can be seen from the previous text, the factors that influence knowledge transfer are interrelated. 2014). Entrepreneurial universities and technology transfer: A conceptual framework for understanding knowledge-based economic development. Additionally, trust and tie strength are associated with the commitment to help a partner to understand new knowledge (Hansen 1999; Inkpen 2000). (2013). The Canadian Journal of Sociology, The author attempts to conceptualize the terms of impairment to the phonological loop in a working memory. As a result, combining key words such as academic engagement or research partnerships with knowledge transfer or knowledge management provided limited results. (2013). As explained in Templier and Par (2015), there are six generic steps involved in conducting a review article: formulating the research question(s) and objective(s), searching the extant literature, screening for inclusion, assessing the quality of primary studies, extracting data, and . 0000135432 00000 n Jbqv+ ;:ab trailer 195 0 obj<>stream The use of prototypes and models helps to resolve ambiguity and to connect new and extant knowledge. Extant. Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary, Merriam-Webster, https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/extant. Trust is positively influenced by tie strength and shared goals, and negatively by ambiguity and organizational differences. They showed that technological relatedness and technological capability (which increases absorptive capacity) were the most important facilitators of knowledge transfer in UI collaborations. (2013). We also identified the practices that could help to overcome those barriers. Up till now, the field is still behind in the development of theoretical perspectives. Design and the management of multi-institutional research collaborations: Theoretical implications from two case studies. Consistent with the breadth of our research question, we adopt an inductive approach using techniques borrowed from grounded theory (Wolfswinkel et al., 2013) and review 282 works on DT culled from IS literature. 2013a). Experience with the collaboration partner has been found to mitigate problems relating to differences in goals, because it leads to more realistic expectations and better insight in the partners needs (Azevedo Ferreira and Rezende Ramos 2015; Steinmo 2015; Wallin et al. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. 2010). Estrada et al. (2013), but we did not find relevant papers in this period. Third, we organized our literature in line with three themescognitive difference, institutional differences and social capital in a summarizing document that formed the basis for the analysis. Ivory tower and industrial innovation. Knowledge transfer in universityindustry research partnerships: a review, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-9660-x, The Complementarity Investment in University-Industry Collaboration, Establishing successful universityindustry collaborations: barriers and enablers deconstructed, Knowledge transfer to industry: how academic researchers learn to become boundary spanners during academic engagement, Values in UniversityIndustry Collaborations: The Case of Academics Working at Universities of Technology, Creating New Knowledge while Solving a Relevant Practical Problem: Success Factors for an Action Research-Based PhD Thesis in Business and Management, What makes industryuniversity collaboration succeed? Because similarity in knowledge background is so important for absorptive capacity, we recommend that this is taken into account in partner selection. Bercovitz, J., & Feldmann, M. (2006). The extant literature and focus group-based studies covered 28% and 3% of primary studies. It is important to have the right people, with the right level of expertise, involved in these meetings (Azevedo Ferreira and Rezende Ramos 2015). For instance, the outplacement of personnel from the firm, secondment and employment of graduates (Galan-Muros and Plewa 2016; Gertner et al. In that case the successful use of the knowledge depends on whether it can be appropriated to the application contexts (Alexander and Childe 2013; Sandberg et al. (2014). 2015; Ulhi et al. 0000019218 00000 n While knowledge transfer is a bidirectional process. %%EOF European Journal of Innovation Management, Aim: Journal of Knowledge Management, 2011). 2016; Plewa et al. Definitions.net. Also Perkmann et al. 25(4), 4557. This paper identifies practices that can facilitate knowledge transfer in university-industry (U-I) research partnerships by systematically reviewing extant literature. 37(2), 4448. Communication practices on the other hand are very important for the quality of knowledge sharing. 2014; Plewa et al. 2013b; Ulhi et al. Our framework and the factors found by van Wijk et al. Second, we identified the information that related to knowledge transfer and included this in our table. PDF DOING A LITERATURE 3 REVIEW - SAGE Publications Inc The term research generated results for a broad range of terms used to indicate collaborations such as joint research, collaborative research, contract research and so on. 2007; Wang and Lu 2007). While the need to publish might be at odds with the need to protect sensitive company knowledge and hamper trust. qbl=[P1\Gu6/a *y.lm*9;]/7!6k 5 ne*~1W'm$= T&;zDqp!q6GsF6>{GQUb#N`M>WR:ekR'U}gcc8A]&$iGCT"O^hl;+% 0000188193 00000 n Industry and academia in convergence: Micro-institutional dimensions of R&D collaboration. Corley, E. A., Boardman, P. C., & Bozeman, B. Our analysis offers practical advice for the management of academic engagement. Learning through joint ventures: A framework of knowledge acquisition. Shane, S. (2005). The .gov means its official. Michele ODwyer, Raffaele Filieri & Lisa OMalley, S. A. M. Dolmans, B. Walrave, N. van Stijn, Jos A. Alfaro-Tanco, Miguel Mediavilla & Amaya Erro-Garcs, Amalya L. Oliver, Kathleen Montgomery & Shimrit Barda, Petri Kettunen, Janne Jrvinen, Tomi Mnnist, The Journal of Technology Transfer In that section we provide an overview of theoretical perspectives and activities that have been described in previous research. Extant literature can be divided into extant original manuscripts, copies of original manuscripts, quotations and paraphrases of passages of non-extant texts contained in other works, translations of non-extant texts into other languages, or, more recently, photocopies or digital copies of texts. Henny J. van der Windt. Knowledge transfer practices are then defined as the activities that facilitate what is needed to bring knowledge into use in another organizations context, such as, teaching, the management of interactions and sharing data and technology. We propose that research into academic engagement can build on theory on knowledge transfer to fill this gap. (2008) provided an interesting starting point for a more focused analysis, and integration of concepts. Making innovative use of academic knowledge to enhance corporate technology innovation impact. 2013). For each of the three topics we identified we will discuss the theoretical insights, their implications and the associated practices for successful knowledge transfer. Part 1. We also found that the current literature is focussed on the responsibilities and perception of the academic partner, with very limited attention for the role of the industrial partner. Industrial Marketing Management, They result in differences in language and different logics regarding what methods should be used. 2011; Galan-Muros and Plewa 2016; Hadjimanolis 2006; Harryson et al. The purpose of this study is to conduct a systematic review of the extant literature of workplace spirituality (WPS) in a manner that helps us trace its emergence in management practices in the past twelve years and to identify the gaps to be addressed by researchers in near future., A two-step screening process was followed to extract the . 2016; Mesny and Mailhot 2007; Plewa et al. The role of experience to mitigate differences in knowledge background remains unclear. This paper continues with a methodological section that describes our review process. For When 'Lowdown Crook' Isn't Specific Enough. 2011; Morandi 2013; Ulhi et al. In our view, an increased understanding of when informal or formal management mechanisms are used is needed. Accessibility 2014; Wang and Lu 2007) and the use of tools or objects (Buganza et al. Additionally, academic knowledge and expertise is valued higher than industrial knowledge. hbbd``b` S` bH"VU H0qGk^L,[AF10C{@ $ Before the spread of writing, oral literature did not always survive well, but some texts and fragments have persisted. In the end we identified relevant papers in 26 different journals. The next step was to analyse the papers we selected. (2013) found that literature on academic engagement was mainly published after 2006. The factors relating to cognitive differences are ambiguity and absorptive capacity. Resultantly, the conclusions we draw about the relation between different factors require more research. Minerva, 47(1), 93114. 0000176313 00000 n Finally, we identified questions for future research based on inconsistencies in extant research and open questions we encountered during our analysis. In exploring extant literature, the study shows that the concept of knowledge gap emanated from the mass media domain and has two distinct pillars or pathways such as differentials in awareness. Previous reviews by Agrawal (2001), Hagedoorn et al. 2002; Bjerregaard 2009; Sandberg et al. ; Attested roughly forty times in extant literature, this word refers to the animal itself. Before More than 20 years into the implementation of public charter schools, the U.S. experience can inform policymakers and others about how to achieve the best possible results through charter school policies. Boundary spanners are effective because they facilitate the knowledge conversion and translation of academics results to the context of the firm and vice versa (Azevedo Ferreira and Rezende Ramos 2015; Gertner et al. Resultantly, academic reputation and previous personal ties are important drivers for establishing collaborations (Pinheiro et al. the review is being conducted. 2014 Nov;22(2):16-22. doi: 10.7748/nr.22.2.16.e1272. While conducting our review we encountered some problems in our search process. Studies on prior knowledge have asked how prior technological knowledge and management capabilities are related. (2008) and relate them to literature on academic engagement. The paucity of extant data in GT studies is of concern as is the dearth of literature on methods of preparing extant data for analysis in GT studies. Muscio, A., & Pozzali, A. The logic of tacit inference. EXTANT | English meaning - Cambridge Dictionary Chapter 9 Methods for Literature Reviews 2002; Chin et al. In this paper we aim to map extant knowledge and perspectives on knowledge transfer in academic engagement through a systematic literature review. Saparito, P. A., Chen, C. C., & Sapienza, H. J. Academic engagement, after all, aims to develop novel knowledge that benefits the academic and industrial partner. 2013a; Pinheiro et al. Second, there is a fear that academic partners, unintentionally, share sensitive knowledge with other companies, due to a lack of experience with handling sensitive knowledge (Ulhi et al. The paper summarizes the research and findings in this emerging field. Technovation, 0000000016 00000 n [Challenges of the grounded theory approach to a novice researcher]. 48(1), 589. To find literature that discusses knowledge transfer we first identified the factors that affect knowledge transfer in inter-organizational collaboration. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 1). Differences in goals are best managed by improved communication (Bjerregaard 2009; Plewa et al. A third feature, and one that attracts little attention, is that reviews go on throughout the duration of a research project rather than the conventional understanding that it is conducted at the beginning of a study and ends there. The process of doing a research proposal involves critical analysis of the extant literature in order to map out what is already known about the topic and to identify the gaps in knowledge (McGhee, Marland, & Atkinson, 2007; Dunne, 2011). The paper concludes with translating these insights into an analytical framework and research agenda. Bringing together this literature on knowledge transfer enabled us to develop a stylised model that shows how different characteristics of knowledge transfer relate in the context of academic engagement (Fig. This can result in more ambiguity and less trust in that the partner will do what is right for you. Research Policy, We're doing our best to make sure our content is useful, accurate and safe.If by any chance you spot an inappropriate comment while navigating through our website please use this form to let us know, and we'll take care of it shortly. ; Exercises involving eccentric muscle contractions of the quadriceps on a decline board are strongly supported by extant literature. Frequent meetings and deliberation are key to recognize and solve differences (Morandi 2013; Plewa et al. 13(4), 287299. Careers. 2006) indicates that epistemic differences can be reduced by strong organizational routines. They sketch a much more dynamic exchange process, in which the industrial application of research outcomes directly influences academic research. This complicates collaboration because different languages, opinions, social behaviours, norms and beliefs make the interpretation of behaviour and knowledge more difficult (Lane and Lubatkin 1998; Mowery and Shane 2002; Simonin 1999). Nonaka, I. Journal of Management Studies, The governance of university knowledge transfer: A critical review of the literature. A comprehensive assessment. 2014; Bjerregaard 2009; Canhoto et al. 0000136159 00000 n hb```nK>c`0pl 323)e.bg?(`rPOd?3;>_#gppIfs.y:00nII.C! l ,@~+Dd7 n1H Reflecting on the challenges of choosing and using a grounded theory approach. We also identified the most relevant factors and practices for the mitigation of these differences. 2002; Ghauri and Rosendo-Rios 2016; Morandi 2013; Wallin et al. While trust is used to express the reliability of a partner (Hansen 1999).

Best Tattoo Shops In California, College Dropout Tour Barstool, Deliveroo Credit Refund, Articles E